3D Cadastre in Australian and New Zealand Jurisdictions: Similarities and Differences
Behnam ATAZADEH, Hamed OLFAT et al
Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering,
Many research studies have been recently conducted in Australia and New Zealand to explore a range of technical, legal, and institutional aspects related to modernisation of 3D cadastre. Most of these studies focus on a particular jurisdiction. This stems from the fact that each jurisdiction is responsible for their own cadastral system. Therefore, the requirements, guidelines, and procedures for implementing 3D digital cadastre are also specific for each jurisdiction. However, the Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM) develops national frameworks and data models, e.g. ePlan, for cadastral systems in Australia and New Zealand. Therefore, understanding the differences and similarities between existing cadastral systems is critically important to support 3D cadastre at a national level. In the current literature, comparisons of 3D cadastre for some civil law jurisdictions as well as standards have been conducted. Nevertheless, the common law jurisdictions, including Australia and New Zealand, have not been compared in terms of 3D cadastre.
Event: 7th International FIG Workshop on 3D Cadastres
Only personal, non-commercial use of this document is allowed.